ReSPA | Yearly Questionnaire European Integration and Accession Negotiations (With Specific Reference to PAR and Governance Aspects) Thematic Area

0

INTRODUCTORY QUESTIONS

0.1 Which administration do you represent?

0.2 In which institution do you operate?
Please insert in the comment box below

1

INDIVIDUAL IMPROVEMENTS

2.1.1. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities have enhanced the exchange of know-how and communication between you and your colleagues? (This question does not refer to the improvement of your institution but your personal improvement, which you can use in your institution or elsewhere. The institutional change is addressed in questions 2.2.1 and 2.2.2)

Please tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please provide details by ticking one or more options below and adding a short explanation(s).

They improved my cooperation with colleagues and provided for having a better working environment within my own institution (please give examples)

They supported me in having better dialogue with my superiors/subordinates within my own institution (please give examples)

They improved my cooperation with colleagues from other institutions from my own administration, from the region or the EU (please give examples)

They helped me improve my career perspective (e.g. promotion, new better or higher position) (please give examples)

They provided for other improvements in personal experience and methods of work (please give examples)

2.1.2. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities have contributed to acquiring knowledge and enhancing skills in the area of European Integration and Accession negotiations (with specific reference to PAR and Governance aspects)?(This question does not refer to the improvement of your institution but your personal improvement which you can use in your institution or elsewhere. The institutional change is addressed in questions 2.2.1 and 2.2.2)

Please tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding a short explanation(s).

My awareness of specificities and best practices in the area of European integration and accession negotiations from EU countries and ReSPA Members (please give examples)

My involvement in European integration and accession negotiation process and structures (please give examples)

My involvement in fulfilling conditions and benchmarks by my institution in the European integration and accession negotiations (please give examples)

Other changes in personal advanced functions and skills (please give examples)

2

INSTITUTIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

2.2.1. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities have contributed to the progress of your institution in improving working methods, coordination, and networking?

Please tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding a short explanation(s).

Coordination and exchange of information within the institution and with other institutions is improved (please give examples)

Best practices are discussed and analysed with a view to their possible application (please give examples)

Specific recommendations/conclusions from the activities have been adopted/implemented (please give examples)

Other changes at institutional level (please give examples)

2.2.2. To what extent do you agree that ReSPA activities have contributed to institutional achievements and strengthened institutional functions in the area of European Integration and Accession negotiations (with specific reference to PAR and Governance aspects)?

Please tick the box below corresponding to your judgement, where 1 (Not at all) is the lowest and 5 (Greatly) is the highest score.

Not at all	Not much	To an adequate extent	To a good extent	Greatly

Please provide details by ticking one or more of the options below and adding a short explanation(s).

The institution is developing specific know-how for European integration and accession negotiations and/or good governance matters (please give examples)

Specific procedures and responsibilities for accession negotiations and/or good governance have been established in the institution or in a wider institutional framework (please give examples)

The institution is engaged in the design/preparation/execution of consultations and reporting related to European integration and accession negotiations and/or good governance (please give examples)

New functions/offices and capacities for accession negotiations have been created/acquired/organised (please give examples)

New tools related to European integration and accession negotiations implementation are being used (please give examples)

Other changes in terms of institutional functions and skills (please give examples)

3

LINK WITH PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM (PAR) IMPLEMENTATION

2.3. Has the institutional improvement in the responses mentioned above contributed to forwarding the PAR implementation in your administration in the area of European Integration and Accession negotiations (with specific reference to PAR and Government aspects), in the period covered by monitoring?

Please choose one of the options below.

Yes

No

Please describe briefly/give examples:

Please provide some references for your statements above, according to the following list (tick as many boxes as appropriate and specify the name and date of the specific report)

ReSPA research documents (Please specify the name)

Internal monitoring documents (Please specify the name)

EC Reports on specific administrations (Please specify the name)

SIGMA monitoring reports and reviews (Please specify the name)

Specific assessments (Please specify the name)

Political endorsement at a ReSPA High-Level Policy Dialogue meeting (Please specify the name)

WeBER Monitoring Report (Please specify the name)

Other (Please specify the name)

4

PROPOSALS AND IDEAS FOR NEW ACTIVITIES

2.4. Please, share with us some potential topics for future ReSPA activities within the area of European Integration and Accession negotiations (with specific reference to PAR and Government aspects).

Regional School of Public Administration

Yearly Questionnaire
European Integration and Accession Negotiations (With Specific Reference to PAR and Governance Aspects) Thematic Area

THEMATIC AREA 2: EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND ACCESSION NEGOTIATIONS (WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO PAR AND GOVERNANCE ASPECTS)

We use cookies on our website to support technical features that enhance your user experience. We also use analytics.